From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755643AbcLOIFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 03:05:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:46708 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125AbcLOIFC (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2016 03:05:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:02:26 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: shuah@kernel.org Cc: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: ftrace: Shift down default message verbosity Message-Id: <20161215170226.03e99938d45b9c9d49ef4d5b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <148007872763.5917.15256235993753860592.stgit@devbox> <20161213122353.a1ec3ead481219a24ea7f0f7@gmail.com> <04486f55-a605-fdf0-5714-fc68e5737276@kernel.org> <20161213102512.4d4169e1@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:03:19 -0700 Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/13/2016 08:25 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 07:06:18 -0700 > > Shuah Khan wrote: > > > >> On 12/12/2016 08:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >>> Ping? > >>> > >>> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:58:48 +0900 > >>> Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >>> > >>>> Shift down default message verbosity, so that do not show > >>>> error results in stdout by default. Since that behavior > >>>> is same as giving --quiet option, this patch removes > >>>> --quiet and make --verbose increasing verbosity. > >>>> > >>>> In other words, this changes verbosity options as below. > >>>> ftracetest -q -> ftracetest > >>>> ftracetest -> ftracetest -v > >>>> ftracetest -v -> ftracetest -v -v (or -vv) > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu > >> > >> Hi Steve, > >> > >> Are you taking this through yours? Or Should I include in my > >> pull request? Please give me Ack if you want me to. > >> > > > > I'll take it. I believe it may be built on top of other patches I took. > > I'm getting ready for a push anyway. Since this only touches the self > > test code, I don't need to run my full test suite on it. > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- Steve > > > > > > Yes. I tried applying to my tree and I think it is dependent on other > patches in your tree. Here is my: > > Acked-by: Shuah Khan Thank you Shuah and Steve! :) -- Masami Hiramatsu