mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: dsterba@suse.cz, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: drop trace_btrfs_all_work_done() from normal_work_helper()
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 09:28:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161221082837.76yw5brgr7wovx6y@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6229501-59de-3b53-db19-7b29a53c3342@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 2016-12-21 08:33:03 [+0800], Qu Wenruo wrote:
> The trace point only uses the pointer, and this helps us to pair with
> btrfs_work_queued/sched.

| /* For situiations that the work is freed */
| DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(btrfs__work__done,
| 
|         TP_PROTO(struct btrfs_work *work),
| 
|         TP_ARGS(work),
| 
|         TP_STRUCT__entry_btrfs(
|                 __field(        void *, work                    )
|         ),
| 
|         TP_fast_assign_btrfs(btrfs_work_owner(work),
|                 __entry->work           = work;
|         ),
| 
|         TP_printk_btrfs("work->%p", __entry->work)
| );

and btrfs_work_owner exapnds to:

| struct btrfs_fs_info *
| btrfs_work_owner(struct btrfs_work *work)
| {
|         return work->wq->fs_info;
| }
 
voilà

> But I still don't understand why backtrace is triggered.
> Since we're just recording a pointer, not touching it.
> 
> Would you please explain the problem with more details on how it trigger the
> problem?

enabled all events played with the fs which was just an upgrade and git
tree sync + checkout so nothing special.

> > 
> > So I think we should either remove the tracepoint completely or change
> > the arguments to take something else than a potentially freed 'work'.
> 
> I'm mostly OK to remove the tracepoint, but such all_workd_done() trace
> should still help to determine if it's a workqueue stalled.
> 
> Thanks,
> Qu

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-21  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-14 14:05 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-14 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: swap free() and trace point in run_ordered_work() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-14 14:08   ` [RFC] btrfs: lockdep says "possible recursive locking detected" in btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-20 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: drop trace_btrfs_all_work_done() from normal_work_helper() David Sterba
2016-12-21  0:33   ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-21  8:28     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2016-12-21  8:45       ` Qu Wenruo
2016-12-21  8:55         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-12-21 14:08         ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161221082837.76yw5brgr7wovx6y@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®