From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/microcode: Use native CPUID to tickle out microcode revision
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:21:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161228112120.GC21788@nazgul.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161228111830.GA21788@nazgul.tnic>
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Intel supplies the microcode revision value in MSR 0x8b
(IA32_BIOS_SIGN_ID) after CPUID(1) has been executed. Execute it each
time before reading that MSR.
It used to do sync_core() which did do CPUID but
c198b121b1a1 ("x86/asm: Rewrite sync_core() to use IRET-to-self")
changed the sync_core() implementation so we better make the microcode
loading case explicit, as the SDM documents it.
Reported-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 26 +++-----------------------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index fcd484d2bb03..2d49aa949fa1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
/* Required by the SDM */
- sync_core();
+ native_cpuid_eax(1);
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, lower_word, c->microcode);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index b624b54912e1..f79249fab389 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -368,26 +368,6 @@ scan_microcode(void *data, size_t size, struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool save)
return patch;
}
-static void cpuid_1(void)
-{
- /*
- * According to the Intel SDM, Volume 3, 9.11.7:
- *
- * CPUID returns a value in a model specific register in
- * addition to its usual register return values. The
- * semantics of CPUID cause it to deposit an update ID value
- * in the 64-bit model-specific register at address 08BH
- * (IA32_BIOS_SIGN_ID). If no update is present in the
- * processor, the value in the MSR remains unmodified.
- *
- * Use native_cpuid -- this code runs very early and we don't
- * want to mess with paravirt.
- */
- unsigned int eax = 1, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
-
- native_cpuid(&eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-}
-
static int collect_cpu_info_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
{
unsigned int val[2];
@@ -413,7 +393,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- cpuid_1();
+ native_cpuid_eax(1);
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
@@ -613,7 +593,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- cpuid_1();
+ native_cpuid_eax(1);
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
@@ -825,7 +805,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0);
/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
- cpuid_1();
+ native_cpuid_eax(1);
/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
--
2.8.4
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-28 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-28 4:39 [PATCH] x86: Fix Intel microcode revision detection Junichi Nomura
2016-12-28 11:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-28 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/CPU: Add native CPUID variants returning a single datum Borislav Petkov
2016-12-28 18:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-29 9:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-31 2:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-31 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-03 18:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-03 19:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-28 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-12-28 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/2] x86/microcode/intel: Add a helper which gives the microcode revision Borislav Petkov
2016-12-28 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-29 9:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-12-28 19:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-29 9:38 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <0a84dd78-809f-c1ef-6adc-551a124170ad@ce.jp.nec.com>
2017-01-05 9:39 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix Intel microcode revision detection Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161228112120.GC21788@nazgul.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®