From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761070Ab2JaWyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:54:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44287 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760753Ab2JaWyD (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:54:03 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20121024111959.GD13010@gmail.com> References: <20121024111959.GD13010@gmail.com> <20121024103559.GB10691@gmail.com> <20121022120558.14413.78980.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <22333.1351077173@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Ingo Molnar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:53:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20164.1351724021@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > Just wanted to inquire about the current status of it, as I'd > rather not pull anything that introduces breakages and is still > work in progress. Once it's all sorted out I'll have a look. Should I pull the x86 disintegration and perf fixes onto a tree derived from tipbot since there are a lot of perf changes in there? David