From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933426AbdACEHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2017 23:07:33 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:51993 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757063AbdACEHV (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jan 2017 23:07:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:07:18 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Zhenyu Wang Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics , DRI , Alex Williamson , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jike Song Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree Message-ID: <20170103150709.543d4f75@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20170103025929.35gp5n27uc7iszra@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> References: <20170103104239.67dd95ba@canb.auug.org.au> <20170103025929.35gp5n27uc7iszra@zhen-hp.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Zhenyu, On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:59:29 +0800 Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > Alex, I liked to have kvmgt related mdev interface change be merged through > vfio tree, but wasn't awared one of Jike's fix had conflict. Could you apply > below fix in your tree? I think in general for possible interface change in > future we still need a pull request for i915 to resolve dependence earlier. This only happens because I merge both trees (I think) ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell