From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968485AbdAERIt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:08:49 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:55294 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965111AbdAERIh (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:08:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 17:08:27 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Suzuki K Poulose Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ryan.arnold@linaro.org, sid@reserved-bit.com, aph@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, dave.martin@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] arm64: cpufeature: treat unknown fields as RES0 Message-ID: <20170105170826.GC29765@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1483552147-9605-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <1483552147-9605-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1483552147-9605-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:48:59PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote: > From: Mark Rutland > > Any fields not defined in an arm64_ftr_bits entry are propagated to the > system-wide register value in init_cpu_ftr_reg(), and while we require > that these strictly match for the sanity checks, we don't update them in > update_cpu_ftr_reg(). > > Generally, the lack of an arm64_ftr_bits entry indicates that the bits > are currently RES0 (as is the case for the upper 32 bits of all > supposedly 32-bit registers). > > A better default would be to use zero for the system-wide value of > unallocated bits, making all register checking consistent, and allowing > for subsequent simplifications to the arm64_ftr_bits arrays. > > This patch updates init_cpu_ftr_reg() to treat unallocated bits as RES0 > for the purpose of the system-wide safe value. These bits will still be > sanity checked with strict match requirements, as is currently the case. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas