mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: reinitialize cbm for new group allocation
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:17:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170109221754.GA47453@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701092258540.3534@nanos>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 11:03:59PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2017, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 04:05:19PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > But since you come here now,  I would think reseting the CBM in
> > closid_free() is better.
> 
> No. closid_free() is the wrong place. closid_alloc/free() merily deal with
> the bitmap and nothing else.
> 
> If you really want to do that, then this needs a seperate function called
> from rmdir.
> 
> > The reason is user can see "right" max_cbm even through rdmsr after
> > rmdir, ie no gap for cbm values between rmdir and the next mkdir.
> 
> And the value pf this is?

Not very useful value, but user may get a bit confused by a non max_cbm if
a closid is not used after rdmsr. A couple of users actually asked this.
Reseting to initial max_cbm may reduce questions from users.

> 
> The closid is not usable after the rmdir, so it's really completely
> uninteresting when the user can read the old value from that configuration
> MSR.

Agree with you. The cbm value is uninteresting after rmdir.

> 
> When the closid is reused then it hardly matters either what's in those cbm
> values (the old or max_cbm).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-07  0:05 Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:56 ` Fenghua Yu
2017-01-09 22:03   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-01-09 22:17     ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2017-01-09 22:24     ` Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:58 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170109221754.GA47453@linux.intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®