From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965258AbdAKIFz (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:05:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33022 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755643AbdAKIEV (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 03:04:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:04:11 +0800 From: Dave Young To: Matt Fleming Cc: Nicolai Stange , Ard Biesheuvel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mika =?iso-8859-1?Q?Penttil=E4?= , Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] efi: efi_mem_reserve(): don't reserve through memblock after mm_init() Message-ID: <20170111080411.GA6381@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> References: <20161222102340.2689-1-nicstange@gmail.com> <20161222102340.2689-2-nicstange@gmail.com> <20170105091242.GA11021@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170109114400.GF16838@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20170110003735.GA2809@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> <20170110125150.GA31377@codeblueprint.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170110125150.GA31377@codeblueprint.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/10/17 at 12:51pm, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan, at 08:37:35AM, Dave Young wrote: > > > > It is true that it depends on acpi init, I was wondering if bgrt parsing can > > be moved to early acpi code. But anyway I'm not sure it is doable and > > worth. > > That's a good question. I think I gave up last time I tried to move > the BGRT code to early boot because of the dependencies involved with > having the ACPI table parsing code initialised. > > But if you want to take a crack at it, I'd be happy to review the > patches. Ok, I will have a try. Thanks Dave