From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751793AbdAMOQG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:16:06 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:36023 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbdAMOQF (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:16:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:09:29 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Laxman Dewangan , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Chanwoo Choi , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mfd: max77686: Use of_device_get_match_data() helper Message-ID: <20170113140929.fnzeh2amb2rkjfkw@kozik-lap> References: <1484314449-10060-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <1484314449-10060-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1484314449-10060-3-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:34:06AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Use the generic helper to get the matched of_device_id .data, instead of > open coding it. > > The driver was checking if matching the OF node with the driver's OF table > was failing, but this doesn't make too much sense since this can't happen > in practice. The fact the probe function was called, means OF registered a > device with a valid compatible string so a of_device_get_match_data() call > will always succeed. So just remove this unneeded check. > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan > > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Add Laxman's Acked-by tag to patch 2/4. > - Mention in commit message that an unneeded check for match is removed. > > drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 9 ++------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Tested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof