From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Mika Penttilä" <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>,
"Bhupesh Sharma" <bhsharma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:06:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118110612.GA7487@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118110105.GA7377@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
On 01/18/17 at 07:01pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/17/17 at 08:48pm, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17 2017, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >
> > > On 16 January 2017 at 02:45, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> efi_mem_reserve cares only about boot services regions, for making sure
> > >> later efi_free_boot_services does not free areas which are still useful,
> > >> such as bgrt image buffer.
> > >>
> > >> So add a new argument to efi_memmap_insert for this purpose.
> > >>
> > >
> > > So what happens is we try to efi_mem_reserve() a regions that is not
> > > bootservices code or data?
> > > We shouldn't simply ignore it, because it is a serious condition.
> >
> > The efi_mem_desc_lookup() call in efi_arch_mem_reserve() wouldn't return
> > anything and the latter would
> >
> > pr_err("Failed to lookup EFI memory descriptor for %pa\n", &addr);
> >
> > then.
> >
> > This is so because efi_mem_desc_lookup() searches only for regions that
> > either
> > - are of type EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA or EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
> > - or which have EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME set already:
> >
> > if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
> > md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
> > md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > For EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA and EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME,
> > efi_arch_mem_reserve() would be a nop.
> >
> > So we're fine here? Do you want to have a more descriptive error message
> > than "Failed to lookup EFI memory descriptor"?
> >
> >
> > For the other checks you suggested in that other thread, i.e. for the
> > post-slab_is_available() condition and so: let me wait until Dave's
> > series has stabilized (or even picked) and I'll submit patches for
> > what remains to be sanity checked then.
> >
> > Also, since Dave eliminated the need for late efi_mem_reserve()'s,
> > my 20b1e22d01a4 ("x86/efi: Don't allocate memmap through memblock after
> > mm_init()") should certainly get reverted at some point.
>
> While testing my patches with latest edk2, I found another thing to be
> fixed, I will repost bgrt patch according to Ard's comment tomorrow,
> maybe with below patch as another fix to the memblock_alloc late
> callback.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-x86.orig/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ linux-x86/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void __init efi_free_boot_services(void)
> }
>
> new_size = efi.memmap.desc_size * num_entries;
> - new_phys = kzalloc(new_size, GFP_KERNEL);
Oops, it was memblock_alloc(), this is a middle test code used for
debugging. Just ignore it.
> + new_phys = efi_memmap_alloc(num_entries);
Maybe a efi_memmap_late_alloc is enough, will see if I can get a better
version, maybe your previous patch can be dropped partially or just
kept.
> if (!new_phys) {
> pr_err("Failed to allocate new EFI memmap\n");
> return;
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nicolai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-16 2:45 [PATCH V2 0/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init Dave Young
2017-01-16 2:45 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init code Dave Young
2017-01-17 10:39 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-17 17:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-18 2:16 ` Dave Young
2017-01-18 13:48 ` [PATCH V3 " Dave Young
2017-01-18 14:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-18 19:24 ` Bhupesh Sharma
2017-01-19 12:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-26 3:39 ` Dave Young
2017-01-16 2:45 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] efi/x86: move efi_print_memmap to drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c Dave Young
2017-01-17 10:39 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-17 17:11 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-16 2:45 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] efi/x86: add debug code to print cooked memmap Dave Young
2017-01-17 10:39 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-16 2:45 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] efi/x86: make efi_memmap_reserve only insert into boot mem areas Dave Young
2017-01-17 10:40 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-17 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-01-17 19:48 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-01-18 11:01 ` Dave Young
2017-01-18 11:06 ` Dave Young [this message]
2017-01-18 13:33 ` Dave Young
2017-01-18 2:28 ` Dave Young
2017-01-27 17:03 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-03 7:12 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170118110612.GA7487@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
--to=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mika.penttila@nextfour.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nicstange@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®