From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753564AbdARQer (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:34:47 -0500 Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:58829 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752730AbdARQep (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:34:45 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2418 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:33:11 EST Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:12:17 +0100 From: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] AVR32: Fine-tuning for two function implementations Message-ID: <20170118151217.GA26808@samfundet.no> References: <308dc151-c874-dfe7-64f9-24a63fc66883@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <308dc151-c874-dfe7-64f9-24a63fc66883@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Around Wed 18 Jan 2017 14:45:07 +0100 or thereabout, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:40:04 +0100 > > A few update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (3): > Return directly after a failed access_ok() in setup_rt_frame() > Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in setup_rt_frame() > Return an error code only as a constant in sys_cacheflush() > > arch/avr32/kernel/signal.c | 5 ++--- > arch/avr32/mm/cache.c | 21 +++++---------------- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) Ack, I guess it slightly simplifies reading. Will add to linux-avr32 git tree. -- mvh Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt