mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	fabf@skynet.be
Subject: [RFC 1/1 linux-next] udf: allow implicit blocksize specification during mount
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:39:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118183935.32503-1-fabf@skynet.be> (raw)

udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
(bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were required or resulted in

"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop1"

This patch loops through different block values but also updates
udf_load_vrs() to return -EINVAL instead of 0 when udf_check_vsd()
fails (and uopt->novrs = 0).
The later being the reason for the RFC; we have that case when mounting
a 4kb blocksize against other values but maybe VRS is not mandatory 
there ?

Tested with 512, 1024, 2048 and 4096 blocksize

Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
---
 fs/udf/super.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
index 967ad87..078a144 100644
--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static int udf_load_vrs(struct super_block *sb, struct udf_options *uopt,
 		if (!nsr_off) {
 			if (!silent)
 				udf_warn(sb, "No VRS found\n");
-			return 0;
+			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		if (nsr_off == -1)
 			udf_debug("Failed to read sector at offset %d. "
@@ -2161,15 +2161,19 @@ static int udf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *options, int silent)
 		ret = udf_load_vrs(sb, &uopt, silent, &fileset);
 	} else {
 		uopt.blocksize = bdev_logical_block_size(sb->s_bdev);
-		ret = udf_load_vrs(sb, &uopt, silent, &fileset);
-		if (ret == -EAGAIN && uopt.blocksize != UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE) {
-			if (!silent)
-				pr_notice("Rescanning with blocksize %d\n",
-					  UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE);
-			brelse(sbi->s_lvid_bh);
-			sbi->s_lvid_bh = NULL;
-			uopt.blocksize = UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE;
+		while (uopt.blocksize <= 4096) {
 			ret = udf_load_vrs(sb, &uopt, silent, &fileset);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				if (!silent) {
+					pr_notice("Scanning with blocksize %d failed\n",
+						  uopt.blocksize);
+				}
+				brelse(sbi->s_lvid_bh);
+				sbi->s_lvid_bh = NULL;
+			} else
+				break;
+
+			uopt.blocksize <<= 1;
 		}
 	}
 	if (ret < 0) {
-- 
2.9.3

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 18:39 Fabian Frederick [this message]
2017-01-20 10:12 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170118183935.32503-1-fabf@skynet.be \
    --to=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®