From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/core: Remove perf_cpu_context::unique_pmu
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:24:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118192454.58008-3-davidcc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118192454.58008-1-davidcc@google.com>
cpuctx->unique_pmu was originally introduced as a way to identify cpuctxs
with shared pmus in order to avoid visiting the same cpuctx more than once
in a for_each_pmu loop.
cpuctx->unique_pmu == cpuctx->pmu in non-software task contexts since they
have only one pmu per cpuctx. Since perf_pmu_sched_task is only called in
hw contexts, this patch replaces cpuctx->unique_pmu by cpuctx->pmu in it.
The change above, together with the previous patch in this series, removed
the remaining uses of cpuctx->unique_pmu, so we remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 -
kernel/events/core.c | 31 +------------------------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 10d223572855..4f8a1f681aac 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -785,7 +785,6 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
ktime_t hrtimer_interval;
unsigned int hrtimer_active;
- struct pmu *unique_pmu;
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF
struct perf_cgroup *cgrp;
struct list_head cgrp_cpuctx_entry;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 5f5b760bc25b..65b706d25422 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static void perf_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *prev,
return;
list_for_each_entry(cpuctx, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list), sched_cb_entry) {
- pmu = cpuctx->unique_pmu; /* software PMUs will not have sched_task */
+ pmu = cpuctx->ctx.pmu; /* software PMUs will not have sched_task */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu->sched_task))
continue;
@@ -8572,37 +8572,10 @@ static struct perf_cpu_context __percpu *find_pmu_context(int ctxn)
return NULL;
}
-static void update_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu *old_pmu)
-{
- int cpu;
-
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
-
- cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
-
- if (cpuctx->unique_pmu == old_pmu)
- cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
- }
-}
-
static void free_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu)
{
- struct pmu *i;
-
mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
- /*
- * Like a real lame refcount.
- */
- list_for_each_entry(i, &pmus, entry) {
- if (i->pmu_cpu_context == pmu->pmu_cpu_context) {
- update_pmu_context(i, pmu);
- goto out;
- }
- }
-
free_percpu(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
-out:
mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
}
@@ -8806,8 +8779,6 @@ int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type)
cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu;
__perf_mux_hrtimer_init(cpuctx, cpu);
-
- cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
}
got_cpu_context:
--
2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-18 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 19:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] Optimize cgroup ctx switch and remove cpuctx->unique_pmu David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-18 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/core: Make cgroup switch visit only cpuctxs with cgroup events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-30 11:57 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-18 19:24 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros [this message]
2017-01-20 9:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/core: Remove perf_cpu_context::unique_pmu Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-20 14:18 ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-20 20:30 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-25 15:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-30 11:58 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for David Carrillo-Cisneros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170118192454.58008-3-davidcc@google.com \
--to=davidcc@google.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome