mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/core: Remove perf_cpu_context::unique_pmu
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:24:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170118192454.58008-3-davidcc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118192454.58008-1-davidcc@google.com>

cpuctx->unique_pmu was originally introduced as a way to identify cpuctxs
with shared pmus in order to avoid visiting the same cpuctx more than once
in a for_each_pmu loop.

cpuctx->unique_pmu == cpuctx->pmu in non-software task contexts since they
have only one pmu per cpuctx. Since perf_pmu_sched_task is only called in
hw contexts, this patch replaces cpuctx->unique_pmu by cpuctx->pmu in it.

The change above, together with the previous patch in this series, removed
the remaining uses of cpuctx->unique_pmu, so we remove it altogether.

Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h |  1 -
 kernel/events/core.c       | 31 +------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 10d223572855..4f8a1f681aac 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -785,7 +785,6 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
 	ktime_t				hrtimer_interval;
 	unsigned int			hrtimer_active;
 
-	struct pmu			*unique_pmu;
 #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF
 	struct perf_cgroup		*cgrp;
 	struct list_head		cgrp_cpuctx_entry;
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 5f5b760bc25b..65b706d25422 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static void perf_pmu_sched_task(struct task_struct *prev,
 		return;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(cpuctx, this_cpu_ptr(&sched_cb_list), sched_cb_entry) {
-		pmu = cpuctx->unique_pmu; /* software PMUs will not have sched_task */
+		pmu = cpuctx->ctx.pmu; /* software PMUs will not have sched_task */
 
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu->sched_task))
 			continue;
@@ -8572,37 +8572,10 @@ static struct perf_cpu_context __percpu *find_pmu_context(int ctxn)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void update_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct pmu *old_pmu)
-{
-	int cpu;
-
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
-
-		cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
-
-		if (cpuctx->unique_pmu == old_pmu)
-			cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
-	}
-}
-
 static void free_pmu_context(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
-	struct pmu *i;
-
 	mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
-	/*
-	 * Like a real lame refcount.
-	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(i, &pmus, entry) {
-		if (i->pmu_cpu_context == pmu->pmu_cpu_context) {
-			update_pmu_context(i, pmu);
-			goto out;
-		}
-	}
-
 	free_percpu(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
-out:
 	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
 }
 
@@ -8806,8 +8779,6 @@ int perf_pmu_register(struct pmu *pmu, const char *name, int type)
 		cpuctx->ctx.pmu = pmu;
 
 		__perf_mux_hrtimer_init(cpuctx, cpu);
-
-		cpuctx->unique_pmu = pmu;
 	}
 
 got_cpu_context:
-- 
2.11.0.483.g087da7b7c-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 19:24 [PATCH v2 0/2] Optimize cgroup ctx switch and remove cpuctx->unique_pmu David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-18 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf/core: Make cgroup switch visit only cpuctxs with cgroup events David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-30 11:57   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-18 19:24 ` David Carrillo-Cisneros [this message]
2017-01-20  9:20   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf/core: Remove perf_cpu_context::unique_pmu Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-20 14:18     ` Mark Rutland
2017-01-20 20:30     ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-01-25 15:23       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-30 11:58   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for David Carrillo-Cisneros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170118192454.58008-3-davidcc@google.com \
    --to=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome