mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Trevor Cordes <trevor@tecnopolis.ca>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: mm, vmscan: commit makes PAE kernel crash nightly (bisected)
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:51:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124125129.GG6867@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170120003544.7e6e34d1@pog.tecnopolis.ca>

On Fri 20-01-17 00:35:44, Trevor Cordes wrote:
> On 2017-01-19 Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 19-01-17 03:48:50, Trevor Cordes wrote:
> > > On 2017-01-17 Michal Hocko wrote:  
> > > > On Tue 17-01-17 14:21:14, Mel Gorman wrote:  
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:52:28PM +0100, Michal Hocko
> > > > > wrote:    
> > > > > > On Mon 16-01-17 11:09:34, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > > > [...]    
> > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > > > > index 532a2a750952..46aac487b89a 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > > > > @@ -2684,6 +2684,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct
> > > > > > > zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc) continue;
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > >  			if (sc->priority != DEF_PRIORITY &&
> > > > > > > +			    !buffer_heads_over_limit &&
> > > > > > >  			    !pgdat_reclaimable(zone->zone_pgdat))
> > > > > > >  				continue;	/* Let
> > > > > > > kswapd poll it */    
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think we should rather remove pgdat_reclaimable here. This
> > > > > > sounds like a wrong layer to decide whether we want to reclaim
> > > > > > and how much.   
> > > > > 
> > > > > I had considered that but it'd also be important to add the
> > > > > other 32-bit patches you have posted to see the impact. Because
> > > > > of the ratio of LRU pages to slab pages, it may not have an
> > > > > impact but it'd need to be eliminated.    
> > > > 
> > > > OK, Trevor you can pull from
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git tree
> > > > fixes/highmem-node-fixes branch. This contains the current mmotm
> > > > tree
> > > > + the latest highmem fixes. I also do not expect this would help
> > > > much in your case but as Mel've said we should rule that out at
> > > > least.  
> > > 
> > > Hi!  The git tree above version oom'd after < 24 hours (3:02am) so
> > > it doesn't solve the bug.  If you need a oom messages dump let me
> > > know.  
> > 
> > Yes please.
> 
> The first oom from that night attached.  Note, the oom wasn't as dire
> with your mhocko/4.9.0+ as it usually is with stock 4.8.x: my oom
> detector and reboot script was able to do its thing cleanly before the
> system became unusable.

Just for reference. This oom was due to bug with the active LRU aging
fixed in the Linus tree (b4536f0c829c ("mm, memcg: fix the active list
aging for lowmem requests when memcg is enabled") 4.10-rc4)

Jan 19 03:02:19 firewallfsi kernel: [85602.858232] Normal free:3436kB min:3532kB low:4412kB high:5292kB active_anon:4kB inactive_anon:8kB active_file:193340kB inactive_file:120kB unevictable
:0kB writepending:2516kB present:892920kB managed:816932kB mlocked:0kB slab_reclaimable:522292kB slab_unreclaimable:46724kB kernel_stack:2560kB pagetables:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:3468kB loca
l_pcp:176kB free_cma:0kB

Look at how all the reclaimable memory is on the inactive_file...
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11 10:32 Trevor Cordes
2017-01-11 12:11 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-11 12:14   ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-11 22:52     ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-12  9:36       ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-15  6:27         ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-16 11:09           ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 13:52             ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-17 14:21               ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-17 14:54                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-18  7:25                   ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-18 17:48                   ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-18 18:07                   ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-19  9:48                   ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-19 11:37                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-20  6:35                       ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-20 11:02                         ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-20 15:55                           ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-23  0:45                             ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-23 10:48                               ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-23 11:04                                 ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-25  9:46                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 12:59                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-25 10:02                                 ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-25 12:04                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-29 22:50                                     ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-30  7:51                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-01  9:29                                         ` Trevor Cordes
2017-02-01 10:14                                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-04  0:36                                             ` Trevor Cordes
2017-02-04 20:05                                               ` Rik van Riel
2017-02-05 10:03                                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-02-05 22:53                                                 ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-30  9:10                                       ` Mel Gorman
2017-01-24 12:54                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-26 23:18                                 ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-27  7:36                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-24 12:51                         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-01-18  6:52             ` Trevor Cordes
2017-01-17 13:45           ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170124125129.GG6867@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=trevor@tecnopolis.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®