From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl / gpio: Introduce .set_config() callback for GPIO chips
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:22:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124142220.GK17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124134504.GA20261@localhost>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 02:45:04PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Good, that's the one I knew about. But I also got another conflict
> against pinctrl when applying on top of f9dd6f6cc63c ("Add linux-next
> specific files for 20170123"):
>
> Applying: pinctrl / gpio: Introduce .set_config() callback for GPIO chips
> error: patch failed: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:756
> error: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c:474
> error: drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001 pinctrl / gpio: Introduce .set_config() callback for GPIO chips
I tried today's linux-next 766074e7818 ("Add linux-next specific files
for 20170124") but only saw that GPIO conflict.
In any case I'm going to rebase my series on top of linux-gpio.git/devel
and submit it as v3.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 12:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] pinctrl / gpio: Allow GPIO chips to use generic pinconfig Mika Westerberg
2017-01-23 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: Widen the generic pinconf argument from 16 to 24 bits Mika Westerberg
2017-01-23 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pinctrl: Allow configuration of pins from gpiolib based drivers Mika Westerberg
2017-01-23 12:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl / gpio: Introduce .set_config() callback for GPIO chips Mika Westerberg
2017-01-23 17:11 ` Johan Hovold
2017-01-24 11:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-24 12:53 ` Linus Walleij
2017-01-24 12:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-24 13:45 ` Johan Hovold
2017-01-24 14:22 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2017-01-25 10:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-26 14:29 ` Linus Walleij
2017-01-23 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] pinctrl / gpio: Allow GPIO chips to use generic pinconfig Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-26 14:25 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170124142220.GK17297@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome