From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752461AbdAYWNe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:13:34 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:40112 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751781AbdAYWNc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:13:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:13:28 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20170125.171328.1978684823149751445.davem@davemloft.net> To: rob.gardner@oracle.com Cc: khalid.aziz@oracle.com, corbet@lwn.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, nitin.m.gupta@oracle.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, adam.buchbinder@gmail.com, hughd@google.com, minchan@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, chris.hyser@oracle.com, atish.patra@oracle.com, cmetcalf@mellanox.com, atomlin@redhat.com, jslaby@suse.cz, joe@perches.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, mhocko@suse.com, lstoakes@gmail.com, jack@suse.cz, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, vbabka@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, khalid@gonehiking.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] sparc64: Add support for ADI (Application Data Integrity) From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <154bc417-6333-f9ac-653b-9ed280f08450@oracle.com> References: <0b6865aabc010ee3a7ea956a70447abbab53ea70.1485362562.git.khalid.aziz@oracle.com> <154bc417-6333-f9ac-653b-9ed280f08450@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rob Gardner Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:00:42 -0700 > Same comment here, and the various other places that employ this same > code construct. Please do not quote an entire huge patch just to comment on a small part of it. Quote only the minimum necessary context in order to provide your feedback. Thank you.