mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	anton@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:04:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126230401.mbehdzy2sclbb73b@alap3.anarazel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126221508.GF6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 2017-01-26 23:15:08 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:49:03AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > BTW, it's also a bit weird that those MMAP2 records triggered by
> > > mprotect/mmap, have prot set to 0...
> > 
> > Yes, mprotect() does: vma->vm_flags = newflags; before calling
> > perf_event_mmap(vma); which then looks at VM_{READ,WRITE,EXEC} bits in
> > that word to generate the prot value.
> > 
> > So that being 0 is a bit weird.
> 
> OK, that was a silly bug :/

Heh, that explains that part.  Thanks for looking into it!


> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 896aa53..e67c5ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -6660,6 +6683,27 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_event(struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
>  	char *buf = NULL;
>  	char *name;
>  
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)
> +		prot |= PROT_READ;
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
> +		prot |= PROT_WRITE;
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> +		prot |= PROT_EXEC;
> +
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
> +		flags = MAP_SHARED;
> +	else
> +		flags = MAP_PRIVATE;
> +
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_DENYWRITE)
> +		flags |= MAP_DENYWRITE;
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYEXEC)
> +		flags |= MAP_EXECUTABLE;
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> +		flags |= MAP_LOCKED;
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB)
> +		flags |= MAP_HUGETLB;
> +
>  	if (file) {
>  		struct inode *inode;
>  		dev_t dev;
> @@ -6686,27 +6730,6 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_event(struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
>  		maj = MAJOR(dev);
>  		min = MINOR(dev);
>  
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_READ)
> -			prot |= PROT_READ;
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)
> -			prot |= PROT_WRITE;
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC)
> -			prot |= PROT_EXEC;
> -
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
> -			flags = MAP_SHARED;
> -		else
> -			flags = MAP_PRIVATE;
> -
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_DENYWRITE)
> -			flags |= MAP_DENYWRITE;
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYEXEC)
> -			flags |= MAP_EXECUTABLE;
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> -			flags |= MAP_LOCKED;
> -		if (vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB)
> -			flags |= MAP_HUGETLB;
> -
>  		goto got_name;
>  	} else {
>  		if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->name) {

I'm not a mm/perf (or kernel in general) expert. But this looks
obviously buggy to me. And the fix makes it look correct. So if that's
helpful (I'm not actually sure):
Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

Not sure if this on its own has enough consequences to be worth being
put into stable?

Not that it's this fix's responsibility, but I did note that that piece
of code doesn't maintain MAP_GROWSDOWN, nor set the bits controlling the
size of the HUGETLB mapping.  Seems harmless enough, but given that I
already looked I thought it'd bring it up.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-10  5:02 Andres Freund
2016-12-12  8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-12  9:01   ` Andres Freund
2016-12-12  9:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26  1:25       ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 22:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26 23:04     ` Andres Freund [this message]
2017-01-30 11:52     ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Fix PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 prot/flags for anonymous memory tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26 20:32 ` perf/jit doesn't cope well with mprotect() to jit containing pages Stephane Eranian
2017-01-26 21:00   ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 21:17     ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-26 21:22       ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 21:34         ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-26 21:51           ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 22:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-26 22:26       ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-26 22:38         ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 22:51           ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-26 23:09             ` Andres Freund
2017-01-26 23:16               ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-27 13:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-27 15:43                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-27 17:35                     ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-27 17:38                     ` [PATCH] handle munmap records in tools/perf was: " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-27 17:46                       ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-27 18:05                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-27 18:10                           ` Stephane Eranian
2017-01-27 19:18                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-01-27 19:26                               ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126230401.mbehdzy2sclbb73b@alap3.anarazel.de \
    --to=andres@anarazel.de \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome