Re: [PATCH] drm/ttm: Make sure BOs being swapped out are cacheable

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:22:47AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> Am 27.01.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 07:23:58AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> > > On 01/27/2017 03:29 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > On 26/01/17 09:46 AM, Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:49:33AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > > Am 25.01.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
> > > > > > > On 01/25/2017 09:21 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > > > > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > The current caching state may not be tt_cached, even though the
> > > > > > > > placement contains TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED, because placement can contain
> > > > > > > > multiple caching flags. Trying to swap out such a BO would trip up the
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 	BUG_ON(ttm->caching_state != tt_cached);
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > in ttm_tt_swapout.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>.
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
> > > > Thanks for the reviews! Via which tree should we merge this?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > I don't maintain a TTM tree any longer. Let's check with Daniel if he
> > > can merge it through drm-misc.
> > I'm trying very hard not to get volunteered for ttm maintainer :-)
> 
> Yeah, ok I volunteer. Wanted to take that over for a while anyway.

I guess you didn't use the dim magic to push it? The test integration tree
isn't rebuild ... Quickstart for the tooling:

https://01.org/linuxgraphics/gfx-docs/maintainer-tools/dim.html

-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch