From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754123AbdA0SCM (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:02:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:35724 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753920AbdA0SCJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:02:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:02:03 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sylwester Nawrocki , Linus Walleij , Tomasz Figa , Lee Jones , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs Message-ID: <20170127180203.eacwbyb2noqjpmgw@kozik-lap> References: <1485419634-28331-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1485419634-28331-4-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20170126194811.rori5j5hmclniqig@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170126194811.rori5j5hmclniqig@kozik-lap> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > This patch adds support for retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs. Three > > groups of pins has been defined for retention control: common shared group > > for ALIVE, CPIF, eSE, FINGER, IMEM, NFC, PERIC, TOUCH pin banks and > > separate control for FSYS and AUD pin banks, for which PMU retention > > registers match whole banks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski > > --- > > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 16 ++++++++ I already have some non-conflicting changes to exynos-regs-pmu.h in my branch. Now I want to add some more which will create conflicts. How about splitting the header to separate patch, so I will take it to my exynos-pmu branch? Best regards, Krzysztof