From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752178AbdAaNO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:14:29 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:8620 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752069AbdAaNN4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:13:56 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,315,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1120157999" Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 15:13:51 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Ken Goldman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs support, for TPM 2.0 firmware event log Message-ID: <20170131131351.akhihknjrqyoij6y@intel.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:22:45PM -0500, Ken Goldman wrote: > > You do not need to send a new patch set version as long as this > > one gets peer tested. And it needs to be tested without hacks > > like plumbing TCPA with TPM 2.0 in QEMU. OF code paths needs to > > be peer tested to be more specific. > > > > For me the code itself looks good but I simply cannot take it in > > in the current situation. > > > > /Jarkko > > Tested-by: Kenneth Goldman Thanks. This explains it. I got Naynas response before I got this one. That's why it went unnoticed. /Jarkko