From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: Cherryview wake up events
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 10:52:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202095200.d5clhprl7rpgrf72@sig21.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170131143740.lgn2svjskjulsucf@sig21.net>
Hi Mika,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:37:40PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> - Powerbutton driver seems simple enough, the only specialty
> of the TI dcove PB driver is the workarond for lost button
> press event after resume. However, I still don't see how
> the PB would cause thermal event irqs on E200HA and how the
> PMIC driver would change it?
In ProductionKernelQuilts I found
DC-TI-PMIC-disable-power-button-support.patch so I guess it
might not be needed because it's probably handled by ACPI.
> I think the mfd driver would be similar to intel_soc_pmic_crc.c,
> the dollar_cove_ti_powerbtn.c I would keep instead of merging
> it into intel_mid_powerbtn.c. I guess what we need is in
> drivers/acpi/pmic/ something similar to intel_pmic_crc.c,
> the ProductionKernelQuilts has 0001-ACPI-Adding-support-for-TI-pmic-opregion.patch.
I have preliminary versions of the mfd and opregion driver,
while testing I found the GPIO opregion is not registered:
Excerpt from DSDT:
https://linuxtv.org/~js/e200ha/dsdt.dsl
Device (PMI2)
{
Name (_ADR, Zero) // _ADR: Address
Name (_HID, "INT33F5" /* TI PMIC Controller */) // _HID: Hardware ID
Name (_CID, "INT33F5" /* TI PMIC Controller */) // _CID: Compatible ID
Name (_DDN, "TI PMIC Controller") // _DDN: DOS Device Name
Name (_HRV, 0x03) // _HRV: Hardware Revision
Name (_UID, One) // _UID: Unique ID
Name (_DEP, Package (0x02) // _DEP: Dependencies
{
I2C7,
GPO1
})
Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized) // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
{
I2cSerialBusV2 (0x005E, ControllerInitiated, 0x000F4240,
AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C7",
0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
)
GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, Shared, PullDefault, 0x0000,
"\\_SB.GPO1", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x000F
}
})
Return (SBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2._CRS.SBUF */
}
...
Name (AVBL, Zero)
Name (AVBD, Zero)
Name (AVBG, Zero)
Method (_REG, 2, NotSerialized) // _REG: Region Availability
{
If (Arg0 == 0x08)
{
AVBG = Arg1
}
If (Arg0 == 0x8D)
{
AVBL = Arg1
}
If (Arg0 == 0x8C)
{
AVBD = Arg1
}
}
acpidbg:
\_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBL Integer ffff8be7b74d97a8 01 = 0000000000000001
\_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBD Integer ffff8be7b74d94d8 01 = 0000000000000001
\_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBG Integer ffff8be7b74d9be0 01 = 0000000000000000
Any idea about it?
devm_gpiochip_add_data() in chv_gpio_probe() indirectly calls acpi_gpiochip_add()
which should use _DEP to figure out to call _REG, right?
Also PMI2 has
OperationRegion (GPOP, GeneralPurposeIo, Zero, 0x0100)
Field (GPOP, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
{
Connection (
GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
"\\_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
)
{ // Pin list
0x0020
}
),
GMP0, 1,
...
(repeat for many more pins)
I guess it means it uses chv_gpio pins and can't work
if the GPIO opregion is not registered?
FWIW, with the mfd driver, /proc/interrupts has
180: 0 0 0 0 chv-gpio 9 TI Dollar Cove
I guess the 9 refers to the 10th pin in north_pins[] which is pin 0x000F, right?
I boot with "dyndbg=file gpiolib* +p" and get
[ +0.012798] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up 0 in _CRS
[ +0.000214] intel_soc_pmic_i2c i2c-INT33F5:00: GPIO lookup for consumer intel_soc_pmic
[ +0.000003] intel_soc_pmic_i2c i2c-INT33F5:00: using ACPI for GPIO lookup
[ +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up intel_soc_pmic-gpios
[ +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up intel_soc_pmic-gpio
[ +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up 0 in _CRS
[ +0.000091] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:01: request pin 15 (GPIO_SUS0) for INT33FF:01:406
but so far the irq never triggers.
Thanks
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-19 11:21 Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-19 11:56 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-19 20:36 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-20 9:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 10:14 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-20 10:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-20 15:59 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-20 21:11 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-21 9:06 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-21 9:16 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-09-23 8:19 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-23 9:59 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-10-05 12:46 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-10-05 13:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-12-04 18:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2016-12-05 11:06 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-24 9:41 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-24 11:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-24 13:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-24 14:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-24 19:23 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-25 9:29 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-01-26 22:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-27 11:38 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-27 13:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-27 13:30 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-30 20:57 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-30 22:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-31 14:37 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-01-31 14:44 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 9:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach [this message]
2017-02-02 10:31 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 11:12 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-02 11:35 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 12:16 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 13:52 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-02 14:26 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 14:31 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-02 15:02 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 15:42 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-02 15:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-02 17:32 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-03 10:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-02-03 13:16 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-09 9:24 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2017-02-09 9:38 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170202095200.d5clhprl7rpgrf72@sig21.net \
--to=js@sig21.net \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®