mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: AbdAllah-MEZITI <abdallah.meziti.pro@gmail.com>
Cc: swarren@wwwdotorg.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
	Michael Zoran <mzoran@crowfest.net>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] somedriver: remove the initialization of static pointers.
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 01:29:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170205002943.GA21184@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486237182-4563-1-git-send-email-abdallah.meziti.pro@gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:39:21PM +0100, AbdAllah-MEZITI wrote:
> In C a static pointer will be initialized to NULL (e.g: draft C99 standard $6.7.8):
> "If an object that has static storage duration is not initialized
> explicitly, then:
>  __ if it has pointer type, it is initialized to a null pointer;"
> 
> Signed-off-by: AbdAllah-MEZITI <abdallah.meziti.pro@gmail.com>

Your subject is very odd :(

And is that the correct spelling of your name that you use for legal
documents?  If not, please fix up when you resend this.

Also, fix the line-wrapping of your changelog, and the C99 standard is
not a "draft" anymore, it was released in 1999 :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-05  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-04 19:39 AbdAllah-MEZITI
2017-02-05  0:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-02-05  7:12   ` AbdAllah MEZITI
2017-02-06 17:33     ` Mathieu Poirier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170205002943.GA21184@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=abdallah.meziti.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mzoran@crowfest.net \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®