From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752519AbdBEWy0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2017 17:54:26 -0500 Received: from ewordofmouth.com ([72.3.247.85]:35502 "EHLO ewordofmouth.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751971AbdBEWyY (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2017 17:54:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:53:59 -0600 From: Trevor Cordes To: Michal Hocko Cc: Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim , Minchan Kim , Rik van Riel , Srikar Dronamraju Subject: Re: mm, vmscan: commit makes PAE kernel crash nightly (bisected) Message-ID: <20170205165359.0c52f86b@pog.tecnopolis.ca> In-Reply-To: <20170205100319.GA22713@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170120155553.gjv2x5eycvdudnil@techsingularity.net> <20170122184559.0b5c0fd8@pog.tecnopolis.ca> <20170123104858.gpjy25y2ogju3gkg@techsingularity.net> <20170125040246.5b211135@pog.tecnopolis.ca> <20170125120420.GM32377@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170129165003.31bd8384@pog.tecnopolis.ca> <20170130075132.GB8443@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170201032928.5d58a7c5@pog.tecnopolis.ca> <20170201101444.GJ5977@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170203183654.1821addc@pog.tecnopolis.ca> <20170205100319.GA22713@dhcp22.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2017-02-05 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 03-02-17 18:36:54, Trevor Cordes wrote: > > I ran to_test/linus-tree/oom_hickups branch (4.10.0-rc6+) for 50 > > hours and it does NOT have the bug! No problems at all so far. > > OK, that is definitely good to know. My other fix ("mm, vmscan: > consider eligible zones in get_scan_count") was more theoretical than > bug driven. I would add your > Tested-by: Trevor Cordes > > unless you have anything against that. I am happy to be in the tested-by; go ahead. > > So I think whatever to_test/linus-tree/oom_hickups has that > > since-4.9 has that vanilla 4.10-rc6 does *not* have is indeed the > > fix. > > > > For my reference, and I know you guys aren't distro-specific, what > > is the best way to get this fix into Fedora 24 (currently 4.9)? > > I will send this patch to 4.9+ stable as soon as it hits Linus tree. That's great news! It will make everyone on the rhbz happy. Thank you!