From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 03:05:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170206030532.GF13195@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170205220445.GE13195@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 10:04:45PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Sure, you need to hit a fairly narrow window, especially if you are to
> cause damage in A, but AFAICS it's not impossible. Consider e.g. the
> situation when you lose CPU on preempt on the way to memcpy(); in that
> case server might come back when A has incremented its stack footprint
> again. Or A might end up taking a hardware interrupt and handling it
> on the normal kernel stack, etc.
>
> Looks like *any* scenario where fuse_conn_abort() manages to run during
> that memcpy() has potential for that kind of trouble; any SMP box appears
> to be vulnerable, along with preempt UP...
>
> Am I missing something that prevents that kind of problem?
For that matter, it doesn't have to be on-stack - e.g. fuse_get_link()
has kmalloc'ed buffer for destination, kfree'd upon failure. Have the
damn thing lose the timeslice in fuse_copy_do() and you might very well
end up spraying user-supplied data over whatever ends up picking your
kfreed buffer. That one could be reasonably dealt with if we switched
to page_alloc() and stuffed it into the ->pages[] instead...
Some observations regarding the arguments:
* stack footprint is atrocious. Consider e.g. fuse_mknod() - you
get 16 bytes of fuse_mknod_in + 120 bytes of struct fuse_args + 128 bytes
of fuse_entry_out. All on stack, and that's on top of whatever the
callchain already has eaten, which might include e.g. nfsd stuff or
ecryptfs, etc. Or fuse_get_parent(), for that matter, with 128 bytes of
fuse_entry_out + 120 bytes of fuse_args, both on stack. This one is
guaranteed to have a nasty call chain - fuse_get_parent() <- reconnect_one()
<- reconnect_path() <- exportfs_decode_fh() (itself with a 256-byte array of
char on stack) <- nfsd_set_fh_dentry() <- fh_verify() <- a bunch of call
chains in nfsd.
* "out" args (i.e. reply) are probably best dealt with by having
coallocated with request itself - some already are and the sizes tend
to be fixed and not too large (->get_link() is an exception, and it's
probably better handled as mentioned above).
* "in" args (request) are in some cases easily dealt with by
coallocating with request, but there's a large class of situations where
we are passing dentry->d_name.name and then there's fuse_symlink().
The last one is ugly - potentially up to a page worth of data, coming
straight from method caller; usually it's a part of getname() result,
but e.g. ecryptfs might have it kmalloc'ed, nfsd - picked from sunrpc
request payload, etc.
AFAICS, your argument applies to the requests that have
some page(s) locked until the request completion (unlock_page() either
by ->end() callback or in the originator of request). If so, I would
rather mark those as "call request_end() early"; they seem to have
the non-page parts of args hosted in req->misc, so for them it's not
a problem.
So how about this:
* explicit FR_END_IMMEDIATELY on read/write-related requests
* no FR_LOCKED flipping in lock_request()/unlock_request()
* modifying the call of end_requests() in fuse_abort_conn() so that it
would skip request_end() for everything that isn't marked FR_END_IMMEDIATELY
* make fuse_copy_pages() grab page references around the actual
fuse_copy_page() - grab req->waitq.lock, check FR_ABORTED, grab a page
reference in case it's not, drop req->waitq.lock and bugger off if FR_ABORTED
was set. Adjust fuse_try_move_page() accordingly.
Do you see any problems with that approach for minimal fix? If all requests
in need of FR_END_IMMEDIATELY turn out to have non-page part of args already
embedded into req->misc, it looks like this ought to suffice. I probably
could post something along those lines tomorrow, if you see any serious
problems with that - please yell...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-06 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 21:23 [PATCH] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-26 12:35 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Jeff Layton
2017-01-27 13:24 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ceph: switch DIO code to use iov_iter_get_pages_alloc Jeff Layton
2017-01-30 15:40 ` Jeff Layton
2017-01-25 13:32 ` [PATCH v3 " Jeff Layton
2017-02-02 9:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] iov_iter: allow iov_iter_get_pages_alloc to allocate more pages per call Al Viro
2017-02-02 10:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 11:16 ` Al Viro
2017-02-02 13:00 ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-03 7:29 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 19:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-13 9:56 ` Steve Capper
2017-02-13 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-02-03 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03 8:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 11:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-02 18:28 ` Al Viro
2017-02-03 14:47 ` Jan Kara
2017-02-04 3:08 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 19:26 ` Al Viro
2017-02-04 22:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-04 22:11 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 1:51 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 20:15 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 21:01 ` Al Viro
2017-02-05 21:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 22:04 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 3:05 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-02-06 9:08 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06 9:57 ` Al Viro
2017-02-06 14:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-07 7:19 ` Al Viro
2017-02-07 11:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-08 5:54 ` Al Viro
2017-02-08 9:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-06 8:37 ` Miklos Szeredi
2017-02-05 20:56 ` Al Viro
2017-02-16 13:10 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170206030532.GF13195@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome