From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752129AbdBFMQ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:16:58 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55751 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbdBFMQz (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:16:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:16:52 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , Calvin Owens , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Hurley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 4/8] printk: always use deferred printk when flush printk_safe lines Message-ID: <20170206121652.GA2769@pathway.suse.cz> References: <20161227141611.940-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20161227141611.940-5-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170201110648.33651ee8@gandalf.local.home> <20170202060538.GA419@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170202153753.GF23754@pathway.suse.cz> <20170202155252.GG23754@pathway.suse.cz> <20170203020418.GC6228@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170203111849.GO23754@pathway.suse.cz> <20170206014846.GA1750@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170206020820.GB1750@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170206020820.GB1750@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 2017-02-06 11:08:20, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (02/06/17 10:48), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > [..] > > from many places: > > > > 4x printk_safe_flush_buffer() > > 1x __printk_safe_flush() > > > > > > replacing printk_safe_flush_line() with printk_deferred() produces things > > like these > > > > printk_deferred("%.*s", end - start, start); > > printk_deferred("%.*s", strlen(newline), newline); > > ah... besides we need to cast length argument to "int". Good point. > > just in case, the patch (which I prefer to be ignored) > > let's keep printk_safe_flush_line(). I do not have strong opinion but I would slightly prefer to keep the helper function. The use of printk_deferred() is a bit tricky and it is better to have only one copy. Steven, could you live with the original patch, please? Best Regards, Petr