From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752594AbdBGAEr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:04:47 -0500
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36168 "EHLO
        mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752503AbdBGAEp (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 6 Feb 2017 19:04:45 -0500
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:04:43 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sigaltstack: support SS_AUTODISARM for
 CONFIG_COMPAT
Message-Id: <20170206160443.55c0f1daac793f1464053cd6@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <9954a03a-5afd-f441-a784-5eb3304d6c3f@list.ru>
References: <20170205101213.8163-1-stsp@list.ru>
        <20170205101213.8163-2-stsp@list.ru>
        <CALCETrVvKeGGN_eb9_t9KDvDVB8WFM6uZTVsKJLx6TvJ4FrrYw@mail.gmail.com>
        <9954a03a-5afd-f441-a784-5eb3304d6c3f@list.ru>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 12:30:38 +0300 Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:

> 05.02.2017 21:31, Andy Lutomirski __________:
> > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> wrote:
> >> Currently SS_AUTODISARM is not supported in compatibility
> >> mode, but does not return -EINVAL either. This makes dosemu
> >> built with -m32 on x86_64 to crash. Also the kernel's sigaltstack
> >> selftest fails if compiled with -m32.
> >>
> >> This patch adds the needed support.
> >>
> >> Suggesting for -stable.
> > This looks correct.
> So it seems my patches haven't made it into LKML
> and I don't know if they made it into stable@ because
> the archive link:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable
> doesn't work.
> There is definitely something wrong here.
> 
> So did they pass into a stable ML?
> If not, Andy can I use your Acked-by when/if resending?
> Are there any known problems with MLs and the archives now?

I have a copy of [1/2] because I was on cc.  I cannot locate a copy of
[2/2].  Please cc Oleg on signal-related changes.