mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Shanth Murthy <shanth.murthy@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@01.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	dvhart@infradead.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
	qipeng.zha@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: read s0ix residency API
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:01:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170206183122.GA14651@rajaneesh-OptiPlex-9010> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201702062146.dHHXqmBG%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:01:43PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Shanth,
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc7]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shanth-Murthy/platform-x86-intel_pmc_ipc-read-s0ix-residency-API/20170206-213213
> config: i386-randconfig-x007-201706 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
> reproduce:
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make ARCH=i386 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c: In function 'gcr_data_readq':
> >> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c:193:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      return readq(ipcdev.ipc_base + offset);
>             ^~~~~
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> vim +/readq +193 drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
> 
>    187	{
>    188		return readl(ipcdev.ipc_base + IPC_READ_BUFFER + offset);
>    189	}
>    190	
>    191	static inline u64 gcr_data_readq(u32 offset)
>    192	{
>  > 193		return readq(ipcdev.ipc_base + offset);

Seems readq is not available for 32 bit configuration. Will send a fix soon.

>    194	}
>    195	
>    196	static int intel_pmc_ipc_check_status(void)
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation



-- 
Best Regards,
Rajneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-06 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-06 13:09 Shanth Murthy
2017-02-06 14:01 ` kbuild test robot
2017-02-06 18:31   ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj [this message]
2017-02-07 10:19     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-08 12:02       ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-02-08 12:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09  6:47 ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj
2017-02-09 11:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-09 12:02     ` Rajneesh Bhardwaj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170206183122.GA14651@rajaneesh-OptiPlex-9010 \
    --to=rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
    --cc=shanth.murthy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®