From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
mikey@neuling.org, joel@jms.id.au, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers/misc: Add Aspeed LPC control driver
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:30:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170210143012.GB18321@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170207234247.19425-1-cyrilbur@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:42:47AM +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:
> In order to manage server systems, there is typically another processor
> known as a BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) which is responsible
> for powering the server and other various elements, sometimes fans,
> often the system flash.
>
> The Aspeed BMC family which is what is used on OpenPOWER machines and a
> number of x86 as well is typically connected to the host via an LPC
> (Low Pin Count) bus (among others).
>
> The LPC bus is an ISA bus on steroids. It's generally used by the
> BMC chip to provide the host with access to the system flash (via MEM/FW
> cycles) that contains the BIOS or other host firmware along with a
> number of SuperIO-style IOs (via IO space) such as UARTs, IPMI
> controllers.
>
> On the BMC chip side, this is all configured via a bunch of registers
> whose content is related to a given policy of what devices are exposed
> at a per system level, which is system/vendor specific, so we don't want
> to bolt that into the BMC kernel. This started with a need to provide
> something nicer than /dev/mem for user space to configure these things.
>
> One important aspect of the configuration is how the MEM/FW space is
> exposed to the host (ie, the x86 or POWER). Some registers in that
> bridge can define a window remapping all or portion of the LPC MEM/FW
> space to a portion of the BMC internal bus, with no specific limits
> imposed in HW.
>
> I think it makes sense to ensure that this window is configured by a
> kernel driver that can apply some serious sanity checks on what it is
> configured to map.
>
> In practice, user space wants to control this by flipping the mapping
> between essentially two types of portions of the BMC address space:
>
> - The flash space. This is a region of the BMC MMIO space that
> more/less directly maps the system flash (at least for reads, writes
> are somewhat more complicated).
>
> - One (or more) reserved area(s) of the BMC physical memory.
>
> The latter is needed for a number of things, such as avoiding letting
> the host manipulate the innards of the BMC flash controller via some
> evil backdoor, we want to do flash updates by routing the window to a
> portion of memory (under control of a mailbox protocol via some
> separate set of registers) which the host can use to write new data in
> bulk and then request the BMC to flash it. There are other uses, such
> as allowing the host to boot from an in-memory flash image rather than
> the one in flash (very handy for continuous integration and test, the
> BMC can just download new images).
>
> It is important to note that due to the way the Aspeed chip lets the
> kernel configure the mapping between host LPC addresses and BMC ram
> addresses the offset within the window must be a multiple of size.
> Not doing so will fragment the accessible space rather than simply
> moving 'zero' upwards. This is caused by the nature of HICR8 being a
> mask and the way host LPC addresses are translated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>
> ---
Without some other reviewed-by: or at least tested-by lines here, I'm
not going to take this. Go poke your fellow ppc people to do some work
here, it shouldn't be up to me to do it for them :(
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 23:42 Cyril Bur
2017-02-08 0:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-08 4:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-02-10 14:30 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-02-10 14:56 ` Patrick Williams
2017-02-10 20:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-02-11 2:52 ` Joel Stanley
2017-02-10 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170210143012.GB18321@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®