From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753489AbdBNJyN (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 04:54:13 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:31910 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753073AbdBNJyE (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2017 04:54:04 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,160,1484035200"; d="scan'208";a="933664170" Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:47:24 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Nicholas Mc Guire Cc: Cyrille Pitchen , Marek Vasut , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RFC] mtd: spi-nor: intel: provide a range for poll_timout Message-ID: <20170214094724.GB15721@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <1486973622-1072-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1486973622-1072-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 09:13:42AM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is > 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us > to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic > context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the > tight-loop here. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire Acked-by: Mika Westerberg