From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755299AbdBQB4d (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:56:33 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:47501 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754904AbdBQB4b (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 20:56:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:56:29 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Airlie Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Daniel Vetter Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the drm tree Message-ID: <20170217125629.28d43302@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: include/linux/kref.h between commit: 56e3d1cd05cc ("kref: prefer atomic_inc_not_zero to atomic_add_unless") from the drm tree and commit: 10383aea2f44 ("kref: Implement 'struct kref' using refcount_t") from the tip tree. I fixed it up (I just used the tip tree version of kref_get_unless_zero()) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell