mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Grégory Clement" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: mvebu-odmi: select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:59:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221175932.508c628a@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170214212502.2752378-1-arnd@arndb.de>

gHello,

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:24:36 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This driver uses the MSI domain but has no strict dependency on PCI_MSI, so we
> may run into a build failure when CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN is disabled:
> 
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-odmi.c:152:15: error: variable 'odmi_msi_ops' has initializer but incomplete type
>  static struct msi_domain_ops odmi_msi_ops = {
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-odmi.c:155:15: error: variable 'odmi_msi_domain_info' has initializer but incomplete type
>  static struct msi_domain_info odmi_msi_domain_info = {
>                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-odmi.c:156:3: error: 'struct msi_domain_info' has no member named 'flags'
>   .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS),
>    ^~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-odmi.c:156:12: error: 'MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS' undeclared here (not in a function)
>   .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS),
>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-odmi.c:156:39: error: 'MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS'?
> 
> Selecting the option from this driver seems to solve this nicely, though I could
> not find any other instance of this in irqchip drivers.

Here is my explanation of why MVEBU_ODMI is the only one affected:
because it's the only one that provides only platform MSI and not PCI
MSI.

Let's look at the other irqchip drivers using msi_domain_ops:

irq-gic-v2m.c:static struct msi_domain_ops gicv2m_pmsi_ops = {
irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c:static struct msi_domain_ops its_pci_msi_ops = {
irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c:static struct msi_domain_ops its_pmsi_ops = {
irq-gic-v3-its.c:static struct msi_domain_ops its_msi_domain_ops = {
irq-mvebu-odmi.c:static struct msi_domain_ops odmi_msi_ops = {

So, besides mvebu-odmi, we've got GICv2m and GIv3 ITS. Their Kconfig
declaration is:

config ARM_GIC_V2M
        bool
        depends on PCI
        select ARM_GIC
        select PCI_MSI

config ARM_GIC_V3_ITS
        bool
        depends on PCI
        depends on PCI_MSI
        select ACPI_IORT if ACPI

so both of them "select PCI_MSI". Then we have:

config PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
        def_bool ARC || ARM || ARM64 || X86
        depends on PCI_MSI
        select GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN

So, when we are on ARC, ARM, ARM64 or x86, and PCI_MSI is enabled,
GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN is automatically enabled. So basically the fact
that GICv2m and GICv3 "select PCI_MSI" ensure that
"GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN" will be enabled.

Therefore:

> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-21 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-14 21:24 Arnd Bergmann
2017-02-14 22:29 ` Jason Cooper
2017-02-21 16:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170221175932.508c628a@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®