From: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@samsung.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
AMAN DEEP <aman.deep@samsung.com>,
HEMANSHU SRIVASTAVA <hemanshu.s@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: Re: Subject: [PATCH v3] USB:Core: BugFix: Proper handling of Race Condition when two USB class drivers try to call init_usb_class simultaneously
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:57:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170222125736epcms5p1eed1cc9c1db3b402a7f7c46df3e04f1a@epcms5p1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CGME20170220192040epcas3p37ded8ece49ed9385df80d3b813a953bc@epcas3p3.samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2782 bytes --]
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Ajay Kaher wrote:
>> Alan, as per my understanding I have shifted the lock from
>> release_usb_class() to destroy_usb_class() in patch v3.
>> If it is not right, please explain in detail which race condition
>> I have missed and also share your suggestions.
>>
>
> Have you considered what would happen if destroy_usb_class() ran, but
> some other CPU was still holding a reference to usb_class? And what if
> the last reference gets dropped later on, while init_usb_class() is
> running?
Access of usb_class->kref is only from either init_usb_class()
or destroy_usb_class(), and both these functions are now protected
with Mutex Locking in patch v3, so there is no chance of race condition
as per above scenarios.
> Maybe that's not possible here, but it is possible in general for
> refcounted objects. So yes, this code is probably okay, but it isn't
> good form.
As per my understanding, I found to be one of the best possible solution
for this problem and this solutiuon don't have any side effect.
thanks,
ajay kaher
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher
>
> ---
>
> drivers/usb/core/file.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/file.c b/drivers/usb/core/file.c
> index 822ced9..a12d184 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/file.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/file.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #define MAX_USB_MINORS 256
> static const struct file_operations *usb_minors[MAX_USB_MINORS];
> static DECLARE_RWSEM(minor_rwsem);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(init_usb_class_mutex);
>
> static int usb_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> @@ -109,8 +110,10 @@ static void release_usb_class(struct kref *kref)
>
> static void destroy_usb_class(void)
> {
> + mutex_lock(&init_usb_class_mutex);
> if (usb_class)
> kref_put(&usb_class->kref, release_usb_class);
> + mutex_unlock(&init_usb_class_mutex);
> }
>
> int usb_major_init(void)
> @@ -171,7 +174,10 @@ int usb_register_dev(struct usb_interface *intf,
> if (intf->minor >= 0)
> return -EADDRINUSE;
>
> + mutex_lock(&init_usb_class_mutex);
> retval = init_usb_class();
> + mutex_unlock(&init_usb_class_mutex);
> +
> if (retval)
> return retval;
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-22 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20170220192040epcas3p37ded8ece49ed9385df80d3b813a953bc@epcas3p3.samsung.com>
2017-02-22 12:57 ` Ajay Kaher [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20170220192040epcas3p37ded8ece49ed9385df80d3b813a953bc@epcms5p3>
2017-03-01 11:12 ` FW: " Ajay Kaher
2017-03-01 15:15 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <CGME20170301151552epcas5p3ecf8f7dc55323b2ceaff8c8a9b9644c4@epcms5p1>
2017-03-02 7:49 ` FW: RE: " Ajay Kaher
[not found] ` <CGME20170301151552epcas5p3ecf8f7dc55323b2ceaff8c8a9b9644c4@epcms5p2>
2017-03-03 14:49 ` FW: " Ajay Kaher
2017-03-03 16:53 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <CGME20170303165352epcas5p2c408a284100b5053daf458a4ad4d9337@epcms5p7>
2017-03-07 4:35 ` Subject: [PATCH v4] " Ajay Kaher
2017-03-07 15:00 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <CGME20170307150103epcas2p348320fdfbb176978d084d8f2b7b9a049@epcms5p7>
2017-03-09 11:34 ` Ajay Kaher
2017-03-09 12:10 ` gregkh
[not found] ` <CGME20170307150103epcas2p348320fdfbb176978d084d8f2b7b9a049@epcms5p2>
2017-03-17 10:56 ` [PATCH v4] USB: " Ajay Kaher
2017-03-23 7:18 ` gregkh
2017-03-21 14:49 ` FW: " Ajay Kaher
2017-03-08 18:05 ` Subject: [PATCH v4] USB:Core: BugFix: " gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170222125736epcms5p1eed1cc9c1db3b402a7f7c46df3e04f1a@epcms5p1 \
--to=ajay.kaher@samsung.com \
--cc=aman.deep@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hemanshu.s@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®