From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932729AbdBVOXB (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:23:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:33668 "EHLO mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932643AbdBVOWu (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:22:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 23:22:46 +0900 From: Stafford Horne To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , linux@roeck-us.net, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/25] openrisc: add optimized atomic operations Message-ID: <20170222142246.GC2449@lianli.shorne-pla.net> References: <1479fc4a4a18712003849341affe74b2a0da609a.1487702890.git.shorne@gmail.com> <20170222112737.GM6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170222112737.GM6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:27:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:11:38AM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote: > > +#define atomic_add_return atomic_add_return > > +#define atomic_sub_return atomic_sub_return > > +#define atomic_fetch_add atomic_fetch_add > > +#define atomic_fetch_sub atomic_fetch_sub > > +#define atomic_fetch_and atomic_fetch_and > > +#define atomic_fetch_or atomic_fetch_or > > +#define atomic_fetch_xor atomic_fetch_xor > > +#define atomic_and atomic_and > > +#define atomic_or atomic_or > > +#define atomic_xor atomic_xor > > + > > It would be good to also implement __atomic_add_unless(). > > Something like so, if I got your asm right.. > > static inline int __atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u) > { > int old, tmp; > > __asm__ __volatile__( > "1: l.lwa %0, 0(%2) \n" > " l.sfeq %0, %4 \n" > " l.bf 2f \n" > " l.nop \n" > " l.add %1, %0, %3 \n" > " l.swa 0(%2), %1 \n" > " l.bnf 1b \n" > "2: l.nop \n" > : "=&r"(old), "=&r" (tmp) > : "r"(&v->counter), "r"(a), "r"(u) > : "cc", "memory"); > > return old; > } Ok, thanks this looks right. I tested it too and it looks to work ok. Note, I still include to avoid copy-n-pastes. So I also wrapped __atomic_add_unless with #ifndef __atomic_add_unless in the generic code. -Stafford