From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751873AbdBXPoX convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:44:23 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([184.105.139.130]:36364 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbdBXPmd (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:42:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:31:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20170224.103158.249041504418389683.davem@davemloft.net> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: ben@decadent.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/25] 4.4.52-stable review From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20170224144337.GA8748@kroah.com> References: <20170224082128.156304123@linuxfoundation.org> <1487944531.26310.6.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20170224144337.GA8748@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:33:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:43:37 +0100 > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:55:31PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.52 release. >> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> > let me know. >> [...] >> >> 4.4 is still missing ccf7abb93af0 "tcp: avoid infinite loop in >> tcp_splice_read()" although you've applied it to 4.9 (in 4.9.11). I've >> reproduced the bug and fix on 3.2, so I'm confident it's also needed >> for 4.4. > > Odd, David didn't include that in his patch mbox he sent to me for > 4.4-stable. > > David, any objection to me taking the patch for 4.4? No objections.