From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751611AbdBXC3T (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:29:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:35100 "EHLO mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751246AbdBXC3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:29:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 07:59:13 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Rafael Wysocki , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Lists linaro-kernel , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vincent Guittot , eas-dev@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: schedutil: Redefine the rate_limit_us tunable Message-ID: <20170224022913.GA17432@vireshk-i7> References: <250f484b4fec4922601f18e719f587aa40c8b220.1487651965.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24-02-17, 00:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > I'd prefer this to spend some time in linux-next before it goes into > the mainline, so I will queue it up for 4.12 if no one objects by the > end of the next week. Sure. Thanks. -- viresh