From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752014AbdB0KyS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 27 Feb 2017 05:54:18 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:52290 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751778AbdB0KyC (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 27 Feb 2017 05:54:02 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:44:45 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, masahiroy@kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recommended notation for OPP to avoid DTC warnings
Message-ID: <20170227104445.GE6795@leverpostej>
References: <CAK7LNAQyc9=3d07-1upywYDk-AaRUGK4mJwAVduCuEJgnY1uFA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAQyc9=3d07-1upywYDk-AaRUGK4mJwAVduCuEJgnY1uFA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 02:18:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> 
> Decumentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp.txt
> takes examples like this:
> 
>         opp@1000000000 {
>                 opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
>                 opp-microvolt = <970000 975000 985000>;
>                 opp-microamp = <70000>;
>                 clock-latency-ns = <300000>;
>                 opp-suspend;
>         };

> If we follow this notation and the device-tree is built with W=1,
> DTC warns like follows:
> 
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /opp_table0/opp@1000000000 has a
> unit name, but no reg property
> 
> Is there a recommended notation to avoid it?
> 
> Maybe, simply omit the "@" ?

I think just s/@/-/ should be fine, e.g. call the above opp-1000000000.

Thanks,
Mark.