From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751930AbdB1TgO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:36:14 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:47592 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751519AbdB1Tfy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:35:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:26:19 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Chetan Sethi Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, punitvara@gmail.com, wsa@the-dreams.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shiva@exdev.nl Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] staging: ks7010: fixed warning of avoiding line over 80 characters Message-ID: <20170228192619.GB22709@kroah.com> References: <20170227144627.GA24022@kroah.com> <1488250776-5602-1-git-send-email-cpsethi369@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488250776-5602-1-git-send-email-cpsethi369@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:59:36AM +0900, Chetan Sethi wrote: > This patch fixes warning of line over 80 characters, as issued by > checkpatch.pl > > Signed-off-by: Chetan Sethi > --- > v2: > - split multiple changes across different patches > v3: > - mentioned patch revision in subject > v4: > - modified description to exclude mention of patch number from changelog > v5: > - updated series for removing additional checkpatch error introduced > > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h | 11 ++++++----- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h > index 9ab80e1..668202d 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h > @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ > #include > #include > > -#include /* spinlock_t */ > -#include /* wait_queue_head_t */ > -#include /* pid_t */ > -#include /* struct net_device_stats, struct sk_buff */ > +#include /* spinlock_t */ > +#include /* wait_queue_head_t */ > +#include /* pid_t */ > +#include /* struct net_device_stats, struct sk_buff */ > #include > #include > #include /* struct atomic_t */ > @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ > > #ifdef KS_WLAN_DEBUG > #define DPRINTK(n, fmt, args...) \ > - if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: "fmt, __FUNCTION__, ## args) > + if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) \ Why did you not use a tab here to indent this line as you were modifying it? thanks, greg k-h