From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@axis.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Subject: Re: DIfferent BogoMIPS value after bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer: Register delay timer")
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302141334.GM21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d22ec429-1a71-e56f-e1d7-28b066be8c1b@milecki.pl>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 02:36:23PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated kernel on my SmartRG SR400ac (bcm4708-smartrg-sr400ac.dts) from
> 4.4 to 4.9 and noticed that this part of the log:
> [ 0.020820] Calibrating delay loop... 1594.16 BogoMIPS (lpj=7970816)
> (...)
> [ 0.190806] Brought up 2 CPUs
> [ 0.200022] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (3188.32 BogoMIPS).
>
> became:
> [ 0.027082] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 800.00 BogoMIPS (lpj=4000000)
> (...)
> [ 0.078858] Brought up 2 CPUs
> [ 0.088254] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (1600.00 BogoMIPS).
>
> This is caused by commit bbaa06702719 ("clocksource/drivers/arm_global_timer:
> Register delay timer").
>
> Is this something expected?
Yes.
> Or should I be worried about this? I'm aware it's just BogoMIPS, but I
> still prefer to ask :)
It's *bogus*. Bogomips is the calibration value that the kernel uses
to achieve delays. It has nothing to do with the speed of the CPU on
modern systems that use a timer instead. (In that case, it's a
calibration value for the timer, rather than a calibration value for
the number of software loops required to achieve a delay.)
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 13:36 Rafał Miłecki
2017-03-02 14:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-03-02 17:46 ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-03-02 14:13 ` Rabin Vincent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170302141334.GM21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=rabin.vincent@axis.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®