From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752054AbdCCRGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:06:54 -0500 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:37564 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbdCCRGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:06:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:52:47 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Peter Rosin Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Jonathan Corbet , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] mux controller abstraction and iio/i2c muxes Message-ID: <20170303165247.el4mcsmo4fbnkjir@ninjato> References: <1486568517-6997-1-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se> <6d87465f-b983-3f62-c7cf-41ed4e50170d@axentia.se> <20170228171842.GA11127@kroah.com> <569c18b3-b1d8-f2e6-7fc4-897aa7df6775@axentia.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vvu4op7gukyogeiw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <569c18b3-b1d8-f2e6-7fc4-897aa7df6775@axentia.se> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --vvu4op7gukyogeiw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Jonathan, Wolfram, do you have any preferences on how this should be > coordinated regarding the new iio and i2c drivers (and iio changes)? You got the acks, all is fine, I think. > My plan is to at some point declare the branch immutable. Then both of > you can pull it in. Or?=20 Yup, sounds good. > But now that I think about it I wonder what the point is of having > Greg pull it in also? Sure, third time's a charm and all that, but... AFAIU, Greg will be your "upstream", so he should definately pull the branch. I will just pull it in to avoid merge conflicts in my tree. Or did I misunderstand your question? --vvu4op7gukyogeiw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAli5n1AACgkQFA3kzBSg KbY6Aw/9EwKWYKXpfLhfHTMt0GlzEO7d/msK1aPqQ7+r23Lm4UoVaDTjlf+f5TnU zOCwwSb21oRcaRwlhJNNjcC9C5r4kRnv+wGTF34quGj0bmxgQbZrhynVNVulLclX 8S+WOqugjF9pi8B3UkURl5LX30zv0tfJUg7Ebv7Yhk1dXeVM9tCxjqD6Rkjy8NH3 WL1zS9aaDgiNAJz2tMOPdQnPilK216UPFdo+9UaUOFAVu0O2SiEciErTVaTQngL+ uag9m1Yx6V0kh9k8HpfjRUMuVIu/EFboTR+abpGRWvKc9C/Tqt5x5tVMlpRRVVr3 v3ZBBMiyheH9JAF9hkbTGhKm3VZ53gLM3mwRYMg7fecDP/QKceo4ITqqlElWHDVo 9dreH4ZFhROY7G+B11zdu/Ba/8sQud9x/jRrj0IxYHrF38jA/fWLsDuCvBPSFC5s ZI5Sb54kF6Y9XrUICDX7neWUHWBU/5O+HKQA9tlq4eP1O8T1EFjJjkIqJrNRLBDR lfihsKOErAV4R+UkeDa/qmGLWQeC00zehbdNBB1NDC94bydHcsG6fcY8l4ZzVPYh TyvnQYjkVEUgVWBzxxWRAAru7h0MeHPX3n5UxddusKJqSuL6FOSyfzcfNzaSMN4h VHEbhUIlK36gJAD20/R5l7/nPUxboBaLMgOduD9MhJc+TSiclcE= =qJWE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vvu4op7gukyogeiw--