From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Jason Uy <jason.uy@broadcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Wang Hongcheng <annie.wang@amd.com>,
<linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Linux MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] serial: 8250_dw: Allow hardware flow control to be used
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 23:23:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170303232305.GU996@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488547866.20145.74.camel@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1789 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 03:31:06PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 00:21 +0000, James Hogan wrote:
> > The CONFIG_HAVE_CLK=n implementation of devm_clk_get() in particular
> > seems highly questionable to me, given that commit 93abe8e4b13a ("clk:
> > add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines") which added it 5 years ago says:
> >
> > > These calls will return error for platforms that don't select
> > > HAVE_CLK
> >
> > And NULL isn't an error in this API.
>
> Which is okay. I dunno what should be returned from clk_round_rate() if
> clk is NULL. I would fix CLK framework, though I would like to gather
> more details.
Hmm, the common clock framwork is just one implementation of the clock
API that won't use NULL as a valid clock handle. HAVE_CLK=n is just
another implementation that does return NULL as a valid value, and
accepts that value in the other clk functions.
> Btw, I hope you also noticed this one:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg25314.html
Interesting.
Following Russel's past advise[1], the following patch on top of Heiko's
patch also fixes things for me on Octeon:
[1] https://lists.gt.net/linux/kernel/2102623
If thats an acceptable fix I'll post it properly. Thoughts?
Cheers
James
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
index 223ac234ddb2..e65808c482f1 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ static void dw8250_set_termios(struct uart_port *p, struct ktermios *termios,
rate = clk_round_rate(d->clk, baud * 16);
if (rate < 0)
ret = rate;
+ else if (rate == 0)
+ ret = -ENOENT;
else
ret = clk_set_rate(d->clk, rate);
clk_prepare_enable(d->clk);
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-11 19:48 [PATCH v2 0/1] " Jason Uy
2017-01-11 19:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] serial: 8250_dw: " Jason Uy
2017-01-11 19:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-01-13 1:33 ` Kefeng Wang
[not found] ` <CAAG0J9-n0toSJL8Ze8Esq81dYnpfrTd42bMiR94zw_btBLjsww@mail.gmail.com>
2017-03-01 18:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-03 0:21 ` James Hogan
2017-03-03 13:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-03 17:33 ` Ray Jui
2017-03-03 17:43 ` Jason Uy
2017-03-03 23:07 ` James Hogan
2017-03-04 0:02 ` Jason Uy
2017-03-04 0:11 ` James Hogan
2017-03-03 23:23 ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-03-04 2:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-04 13:09 ` [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Fix breakage when HAVE_CLK=n James Hogan
2017-03-04 14:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-03-06 10:16 ` James Hogan
2017-03-06 23:38 ` Jason Uy
2017-03-05 0:44 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-03-13 11:14 ` James Hogan
2017-03-14 2:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170303232305.GU996@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=annie.wang@amd.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jason.uy@broadcom.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=noamc@ezchip.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome