From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
mhiramat@kernel.org, ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm: kprobes: remove kprobe_exceptions_notify
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:38:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306183815.GX21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306180720.GC7467@naverao1-tp.localdomain>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:37:20PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> On 2017/02/08 01:24AM, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> > ... as the weak variant will do.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/probes/kprobes/core.c | 10 ----------
> > arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 6 ------
> > 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)
>
> With the generic changes in this series now in -rc1, can you please pick
> this up?
It would've been nice to have been in the To: or Cc: on this patch,
I suspect everyone on the ARM side ignored this series (I certainly
didn't notice it, and I suspect the ARM64 folk didn't notice it for
exactly the same reason.)
In any case, this patch needs to be split - ARM and ARM64 are
maintained separately (as stated in MAINTAINERS), and patches go via
different trees. Please resubmit with the patch split between the
architectures and proper recipients in the headers.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-06 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-07 19:54 [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: introduce weak variant of kprobe_exceptions_notify Naveen N. Rao
2017-02-07 19:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm: kprobes: remove kprobe_exceptions_notify Naveen N. Rao
2017-03-06 18:07 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-03-06 18:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-03-06 19:04 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-03-06 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Naveen N. Rao
2017-03-06 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: " Naveen N. Rao
2017-02-07 19:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: kprobes: remove kprobe_exceptions_notify() Naveen N. Rao
2017-02-14 12:40 ` [3/3] " Michael Ellerman
2017-02-08 1:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] kprobes: introduce weak variant of kprobe_exceptions_notify Masami Hiramatsu
2017-02-10 3:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-10 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-13 8:32 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-02-14 12:40 ` [1/3] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170306183815.GX21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®