From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: drop redundant flags generation
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:16:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307091645.88a9c9511361a39dc5dad191@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488819625-27395-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at>
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:00:25 +0100
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> wrote:
> The generator was emitting quite a few duplicate flags which was making
> doublebitand.cocci nervous. This awk hack resolves the duplicate issue.
Yes, I know that.
I don't think that the duplicating those flags in "automatic generated"
source code is not so harmful. I personally prefer to keep awk code
simpler...
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
> ---
>
> The coccinelle complaints emitted was about 230 findings total:
> ./arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c:214:10-20: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c:214:23-33: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c:218:10-20: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c:218:23-33: duplicated argument to & or |
> ....
> ./tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/inat-tables.c:214:10-20: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/inat-tables.c:214:23-33: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/inat-tables.c:218:10-20: duplicated argument to & or |
> ./tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/inat-tables.c:218:23-33: duplicated argument to & or |
> ...
> spatch --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/tests/doublebitand.cocci inat-tables.c -D report
> will give you the full list - all are caused by duplicates in the generated
> output by the add_flags function in the two instances of gen-insn-attr-x86.awk.
>
> Q: The two copies of gen-insn-attr-x86.awk are identical and its not actually clear
> why this duplication is needed ? Further the maintainers list emitted for the
> two files differ.
>
> Patch was checked by manual review of the diff between the initial file and the
> regenerated file after the below patch was applied.
> Second verification was by make tools/objtool and comparing the generated binaries
> in tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.o with diff.
>
> Patch is against 4.11-rc1 (localversion-next is next-20170306)
>
> arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk | 12 ++++++++++--
> tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk | 12 ++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk b/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> index a3d2c62..9cdeefe 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> @@ -226,8 +226,16 @@ function print_table(tbl,name,fmt,n)
> }
>
> function add_flags(old,new) {
> - if (old && new)
> - return old " | " new
> + if (old == new)
> + return old
> + if (old && new) {
> + if(match(old,new))
> + return old
> + else if(match(new,old))
> + return new
> + else
> + return old " | " new
> + }
> else if (old)
> return old
> else
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> index a3d2c62..9cdeefe 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> +++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/insn/gen-insn-attr-x86.awk
> @@ -226,8 +226,16 @@ function print_table(tbl,name,fmt,n)
> }
>
> function add_flags(old,new) {
> - if (old && new)
> - return old " | " new
> + if (old == new)
> + return old
> + if (old && new) {
> + if(match(old,new))
> + return old
> + else if(match(new,old))
> + return new
> + else
> + return old " | " new
> + }
> else if (old)
> return old
> else
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 17:00 Nicholas Mc Guire
2017-03-06 17:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-06 17:54 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2017-03-06 21:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-07 8:13 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2017-03-07 13:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-07 14:18 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2017-03-07 8:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170307091645.88a9c9511361a39dc5dad191@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®