mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	chao@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: skip scanning free nid bitmap of full NAT blocks
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:40:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170310184041.GB22979@jaegeuk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ac60332-bc04-f398-3746-4ff5dbe53887@gmail.com>

On 03/10, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> On 3/1/2017 17:09, Chao Yu wrote:
> > This patch adds to account free nids for each NAT blocks, and while
> > scanning all free nid bitmap, do check count and skip lookuping in
> > full NAT block.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/debug.c |  1 +
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  2 ++
> >  fs/f2fs/node.c  | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/debug.c b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > index a77df377e2e8..ee2d0a485fc3 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/debug.c
> > @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static void update_mem_info(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  	si->base_mem += (NM_I(sbi)->nat_bits_blocks << F2FS_BLKSIZE_BITS);
> >  	si->base_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_blocks * NAT_ENTRY_BITMAP_SIZE;
> >  	si->base_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_blocks / 8;
> > +	si->base_mem += NM_I(sbi)->nat_blocks * sizeof(unsigned short);
> >  
> >  get_cache:
> >  	si->cache_mem = 0;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 7e2924981eeb..c0b33719dfa9 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -557,6 +557,8 @@ struct f2fs_nm_info {
> >  	struct mutex build_lock;	/* lock for build free nids */
> >  	unsigned char (*free_nid_bitmap)[NAT_ENTRY_BITMAP_SIZE];
> >  	unsigned char *nat_block_bitmap;
> > +	unsigned short *free_nid_count;	/* free nid count of NAT block */
> > +	spinlock_t free_nid_lock;	/* protect updating of nid count */
> >  
> 
> Sorry for my reply so late.
> 
> Is the free_nid_lock needed here?
> The free_nid_count should be protected as free_nid_bitmap,
> but there isn't any lock for free_nid_bitmap.

update_free_nid_bitmap() is covered by nid_list_lock except scan_nat_page.
But, it seems build_free_nids() can cover the exception. So, at a glance,
we don't need free_nid_lock.

Chao, could you check the whole lock coverage again?

> How about atomic? 

IMO, atomic array would not be a proper way.

Thanks,

> The free node ids management seems a little complex now.
> 
> thanks,
> Kinglong Mee
> 
> >  	/* for checkpoint */
> >  	char *nat_bitmap;		/* NAT bitmap pointer */
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index 94967171dee8..1a759d45b7e4 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1823,7 +1823,8 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> >  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
> >  }
> >  
> > -void update_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool set)
> > +void update_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
> > +							bool set, bool build)
> >  {
> >  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> >  	unsigned int nat_ofs = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(nid);
> > @@ -1836,6 +1837,13 @@ void update_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool set)
> >  		set_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> >  	else
> >  		clear_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> > +
> > +	spin_lock(&nm_i->free_nid_lock);
> > +	if (set)
> > +		nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]++;
> > +	else if (!build)
> > +		nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]--;
> > +	spin_unlock(&nm_i->free_nid_lock);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > @@ -1847,6 +1855,9 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  	unsigned int nat_ofs = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(start_nid);
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > +	if (test_bit_le(nat_ofs, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap))
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	set_bit_le(nat_ofs, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap);
> >  
> >  	i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> > @@ -1861,7 +1872,7 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
> >  		if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
> >  			freed = add_free_nid(sbi, start_nid, true);
> > -		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, start_nid, freed);
> > +		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, start_nid, freed, true);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1877,6 +1888,8 @@ static void scan_free_nid_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nm_i->nat_blocks; i++) {
> >  		if (!test_bit_le(i, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap))
> >  			continue;
> > +		if (!nm_i->free_nid_count[i])
> > +			continue;
> >  		for (idx = 0; idx < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; idx++) {
> >  			nid_t nid;
> >  
> > @@ -2081,7 +2094,7 @@ bool alloc_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t *nid)
> >  		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
> >  		nm_i->available_nids--;
> >  
> > -		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, *nid, false);
> > +		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, *nid, false, false);
> >  
> >  		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >  		return true;
> > @@ -2137,7 +2150,7 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> >  
> >  	nm_i->available_nids++;
> >  
> > -	update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true);
> > +	update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true, false);
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> >  
> > @@ -2467,11 +2480,11 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >  			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, false);
> >  			spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> >  			NM_I(sbi)->available_nids++;
> > -			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true);
> > +			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true, false);
> >  			spin_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> >  		} else {
> >  			spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> > -			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, false);
> > +			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, false, false);
> >  			spin_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -2651,6 +2664,14 @@ int init_free_nid_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  								GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!nm_i->nat_block_bitmap)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	nm_i->free_nid_count = f2fs_kvzalloc(nm_i->nat_blocks *
> > +					sizeof(unsigned short), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!nm_i->free_nid_count)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_init(&nm_i->free_nid_lock);
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -2730,6 +2751,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  
> >  	kvfree(nm_i->nat_block_bitmap);
> >  	kvfree(nm_i->free_nid_bitmap);
> > +	kvfree(nm_i->free_nid_count);
> >  
> >  	kfree(nm_i->nat_bitmap);
> >  	kfree(nm_i->nat_bits);
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-10 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-01  9:09 Chao Yu
2017-03-10  3:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " Kinglong Mee
2017-03-10 18:40   ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2017-03-13 12:09     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170310184041.GB22979@jaegeuk.local \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=kinglongmee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®