From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933592AbdCUQ6G (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:58:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.161.194]:33318 "EHLO mail-yw0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757074AbdCUQ4y (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:56:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:56:50 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Sergei Shtylyov , Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA drivers Message-ID: <20170321165650.GA3706@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1489509414-11491-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <20170316213255.GF1480@htj.duckdns.org> <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:08:26PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > Looks fine to me from libata side. Once it gets tested, how should > > the patches be routed? I don't think it'd make sense to route them > > separately. > > Hi Tejun, I can take the series through ARM-SoC tree with your ack. Once the review points are addressed, please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo and route through the arm tree. Thanks. -- tejun