From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935143AbdCVQl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:41:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:33836 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934505AbdCVQlt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:41:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:40:40 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] printk: enable printk offloading Message-ID: <20170322164040.GC494@tigerII.localdomain> References: <20170306124554.828-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170306124554.828-5-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20170322154327.GD4008@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170322154327.GD4008@pathway.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On (03/22/17 16:43), Petr Mladek wrote: > The patch looks fine to me. But it might get more complicated > if we decide to have a global option to avoid the kthread. > Let's discuss this in the 3rd patch first. thanks for taking a look. so I was going to publish a new patch set tonight, but now I think I'll wait for a day or two, since there are potentially more people looking at 0003 now. in the meantime, I uploaded the patches to https://github.com/sergey-senozhatsky/linux-next-ss/commits/printk-kthread there are some splits/reworks/etc. -ss