From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760787AbdCVQ5R (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:57:17 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:46094 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760588AbdCVQ5L (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:57:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:57:07 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] arm64: define BUG() instruction without CONFIG_BUG Message-ID: <20170322165706.GE25645@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20170314213939.3874497-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20170322143729.GB25645@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20170322153208.GC25645@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 05:29:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Catalin Marinas > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Catalin Marinas > >> wrote: > > >> Taht was certainly not intended, and I don't see yet what exactly is going on. > >> What is your setting for CONFIG_BUG and CONFIG_BUGVERBOSE? > > > > CONFIG_BUG=y > > CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y > > Ok, I found the typo, can you just fold this in, or should I send an > updated patch? I'll fold it in. Thanks. -- Catalin