From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
juri.lelli@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/deadline: Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:21:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170322232145.GO11100@X58A-UD3R> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322123728.wjqy4sr2d2zsfqan@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:37:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:52:24PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > When cpudl_find() returns any among free_cpus, the cpu might not be
> > closer than others, considering sched domain. For example:
> >
> > this_cpu: 15
> > free_cpus: 0, 1,..., 14 (== later_mask)
> > best_cpu: 0
> >
> > topology:
> >
> > 0 --+
> > +--+
> > 1 --+ |
> > +-- ... --+
> > 2 --+ | |
> > +--+ |
> > 3 --+ |
> >
> > ... ...
> >
> > 12 --+ |
> > +--+ |
> > 13 --+ | |
> > +-- ... -+
> > 14 --+ |
> > +--+
> > 15 --+
> >
> > In this case, it would be best to select 14 since it's a free cpu and
> > closest to 15(this_cpu). However, currently the code select 0(best_cpu)
> > even though that's just any among free_cpus. Fix it.
>
> This would result in picking the HT sibling, if available. Which is
> typically the worst possible pick.
>
> If you add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING, which denotes a preference for
> any other sibling domain above this one, this might work.
Sure. I will add that support as well. Thank you.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-21 7:52 Byungchul Park
2017-03-21 13:28 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2017-03-22 2:46 ` Byungchul Park
2017-03-22 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-22 23:21 ` Byungchul Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170322232145.GO11100@X58A-UD3R \
--to=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®