From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:06:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170329080625.GC27994@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170328175408.GD7838@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue 28-03-17 10:54:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently
> > winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the
> > value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting
> > it. Michal?
>
> Well, let's see what it looks like to do that. I went down the rabbit
> hole trying to understand why some of the SHM_ flags had the same value
> as each other until I realised some of them were internal flags, some
> were flags to shmat() and others were flags to shmget(). Hopefully I
> disambiguated them nicely in this patch. I also added 8MB and 16GB sizes.
> Any more architectures with a pet favourite huge/giant page size we
> should add convenience defines for?
Do we actually have any users?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-08 17:06 Davidlohr Bueso
2017-03-08 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
2017-03-09 3:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2017-03-09 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-28 16:53 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-03-28 16:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-03-28 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-03-29 8:06 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-03-29 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2017-03-30 6:12 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-12 16:18 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-04-12 16:30 ` Andi Kleen
2017-04-12 17:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-13 6:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-04-13 12:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-07-17 22:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-07-17 22:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm:hugetlb: Define system call hugetlb size encodings in single file Mike Kravetz
2017-07-18 0:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-07-26 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-17 22:28 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm: arch: Use new hugetlb size encoding definitions Mike Kravetz
2017-07-26 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-17 22:28 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm: shm: " Mike Kravetz
2017-07-26 9:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 10:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 17:39 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-07-26 18:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-07-27 7:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-27 21:18 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-07-28 6:30 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170329080625.GC27994@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome