From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: put keyring if install_session_keyring_to_cred() fails
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:48:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170403174857.GA72831@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2347.1491234125@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 04:42:05PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +error3:
> > + key_put(keyring);
> > error2:
> > mutex_unlock(&key_session_mutex);
>
> I would prefer the put to be outside of the locked section. How about the
> attached instead?
[...]
> diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
> index 44451af828c0..8e98e5d1b5fb 100644
> --- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
> +++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
> @@ -793,21 +793,20 @@ long join_session_keyring(const char *name)
> KEY_ALLOC_IN_QUOTA, NULL, NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(keyring)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(keyring);
> - goto error2;
> + goto error_unlock_no_keyring;
> }
> } else if (IS_ERR(keyring)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(keyring);
> - goto error2;
> + goto error_unlock_no_keyring;
> } else if (keyring == new->session_keyring) {
> - key_put(keyring);
> ret = 0;
> - goto error2;
> + goto error_unlock;
> }
>
> /* we've got a keyring - now to install it */
> ret = install_session_keyring_to_cred(new, keyring);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto error2;
> + goto error_unlock;
>
> commit_creds(new);
> mutex_unlock(&key_session_mutex);
> @@ -817,8 +816,11 @@ long join_session_keyring(const char *name)
> okay:
> return ret;
>
> -error2:
> +error_unlock_no_keyring:
> + keyring = NULL;
> +error_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&key_session_mutex);
> + key_put(keyring);
> error:
> abort_creds(new);
> return ret;
I guess I'm okay with either patch, but I think jumping to the error labels in
the way I proposed is more straightforward since it keeps things in the logical
order. And I doubt there's much advantage in moving key_put() outside of the
mutex, given that key_session_mutex is only used for joining session keyrings so
shouldn't be contended, and key_put() hardly does any work anyway.
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-01 18:54 Eric Biggers
2017-04-03 15:42 ` David Howells
2017-04-03 17:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170403174857.GA72831@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome