From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Cc: "Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Al Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"René Nyffenegger" <mail@renenyffenegger.ch>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Stephen Smalley" <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
"Pavel Tikhomirov" <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>,
"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Brian Gerst" <brgerst@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Will.Deacon@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 15:34:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201704042234.v34MYagd031215@mail.zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcbSZGWX23QTWmM4a_07ui-8Xyz4H2NLj1LXFFbZvnv9tc_XQ@mail.gmail.com>
<will.deacon@arm.com>,Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
From: hpa@zytor.com
Message-ID: <C92745AD-C4D9-441E-854C-985512E5FD8F@zytor.com>
On April 4, 2017 12:21:48 PM PDT, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:27 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>> On 04/04/17 10:47, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>>> index 516593e66bd6..12fa851c7fa8 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64_types.h
>>> @@ -78,4 +78,15 @@ typedef struct { pteval_t pte; } pte_t;
>>>
>>> #define EARLY_DYNAMIC_PAGE_TABLES 64
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * User space process size. 47bits minus one guard page. The guard
>>> + * page is necessary on Intel CPUs: if a SYSCALL instruction is at
>>> + * the highest possible canonical userspace address, then that
>>> + * syscall will enter the kernel with a non-canonical return
>>> + * address, and SYSRET will explode dangerously. We avoid this
>>> + * particular problem by preventing anything from being mapped
>>> + * at the maximum canonical address.
>>> + */
>>> +#define TASK_SIZE_MAX ((_AC(1, UL) << 47) - PAGE_SIZE)
>>> +
>>> #endif /* _ASM_X86_PGTABLE_64_DEFS_H */
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>>> index 3cada998a402..e80822582d3e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>>> @@ -825,17 +825,6 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const
>void *x)
>>> #define KSTK_ESP(task) (task_pt_regs(task)->sp)
>>>
>>> #else
>>> -/*
>>> - * User space process size. 47bits minus one guard page. The guard
>>> - * page is necessary on Intel CPUs: if a SYSCALL instruction is at
>>> - * the highest possible canonical userspace address, then that
>>> - * syscall will enter the kernel with a non-canonical return
>>> - * address, and SYSRET will explode dangerously. We avoid this
>>> - * particular problem by preventing anything from being mapped
>>> - * at the maximum canonical address.
>>> - */
>>> -#define TASK_SIZE_MAX ((1UL << 47) - PAGE_SIZE)
>>> -
>>> /* This decides where the kernel will search for a free chunk of vm
>>> * space during mmap's.
>>> */
>>>
>>
>> This should be an entirely separate patch; if nothing else you need
>to
>> explain it in the comments.
>
>I will explain it in the commit message, it should be easier than a
>separate patch.
>
>>
>> Also, you say this is for "x86", but I still don't see any code for
>i386
>> whatsoever. Have you verified *all* the i386 and i386-compat paths
>to
>> make sure they go via prepare_exit_to_usermode()? [Cc: Andy]
>
>I did but I will do it again for the next iteration.
>
>>
>> Finally, I can't really believe I'm the only person for whom
>"Specific
>> usage of verity_pre_usermode_state" is completely opaque.
>
>I agree, I will improve it.
>
>>
>> -hpa
>>
Easier for you, perhaps, but not for everyone else...
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-04 17:47 [PATCH v6 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall Thomas Garnier
2017-04-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] x86/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier
2017-04-04 18:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-04-04 18:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2017-04-04 18:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-04-04 19:21 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-04-04 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2017-04-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] arm/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-04-04 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: " Thomas Garnier
2017-04-05 14:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-05 14:36 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-04-05 17:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-05 18:14 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-04-07 16:11 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201704042234.v34MYagd031215@mail.zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mail@renenyffenegger.ch \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®